3
It is less obvious to us that we need all of the over 1,000 crypto coins that have been created to date, raising over $3.3 billion via ICOs so far in 2017 alone. In our opinion, there is clearly a great deal of froth, wishful thinking, and less-than-ethical behavior surrounding many of these coins. That said, however, the great thing about market prices is that they are accurate in the sufficiently short-term 100% of the time. Therefore, we have no quarrel with this estimate; these ICOs have created billions in market value in a very short time, and therefore this definitely qualifies as a boomlet, perhaps on its way to becoming a bo
om. Is it also a bubble? Maybe … but bubbles can
take a long time to pop.
Coin vs Common
The easiest analogy for crypto coins is common stock, although there are significant differences between the two. Some observers have commented that, unlike common stock, the tokens an investor receives from an ICO are worthless because they typically will not confer any right of economic ownership or any portion of the future cash flows of the underlying company. When thinking this through, we should begin by highlighting that not all coins are created equal, and we have seen coins that give the holder a right to receive a portion of a
company’s revenue or net income. Most coins, however, rely on underlying demand for the company’s products or services to, when set ag
ainst a fixed supply of coins, drive the value of these coins higher. More on this later. We also likely should partition our thinking between small and large (activist) shareholders, and between dividend-paying and non-dividend-paying stocks. Large activi
st shareholders can have considerable influence over companies’ governance. It
is not unusual for these shareholders to demand that the value of certain assets within a company be realized through sale or otherwise. Similarly, dividend-paying stocks do provide the holder with steady income (although of course, this is only true
so long as the company’s financial performance makes such a dividend prudent, and
there is almost never a guarantee). In addition, the dividend is typically only part of the reason investors own a stock; usually there is a hope of capital appreciation as well. Excepting these two somewhat special cases, however, the vast majority of ownership
situations for common equity will never fully benefit from a right of ownership. Let’s
consider that share of common stock you might own in, say, GOOGL. We never like to say never, but we deem it HIGHLY unlikely that the management team is going to listen to your views on how to run the company. We deem it HIGHLY unlikely that you could convince the board to exchange your share of stock for 1x10-9 % (your fractional ownershi
p of GOOGL’s 692M shares outstanding) of the company’s office
furniture, intellectual property, cash, accounts receivable, etc. We deem it HIGHLY unlikely that the company is going to pay you a dividend any time soon (although they may buy back stock, which can also more or less happen in coin). If we are correct that all these events are quite unlikely, then what good is that right of ownership? Of course, the share of stock has value
–
going back to our market dynamic, it has value because you could very likely sell it for close to the $1,041 that GOOGL stock commands as we write this. In turn, this price typically depends upon the judgement of the incremental buyer / seller regarding two items: 1) the future operating performance of Alphabet the company (i.e., happy customers, market share, innovative products, revenue, earnings, cash flow, ROIC, ROIC/IC
–
essentially how well the company will compete, deploy capital, and serve as a prudent steward of that capital); and 2) what market participants think that operating performance is worth (typically based on some valuation metric like P/E which is a short-cut to considering
Internet
Industry Update
14 November 20173